How we work
How a piece is put together here, in the order the work actually happens. This page exists so that a reader can check our method against the result, and so that the desk has something to be held to.
Reporting
- Start at the instrument. Before a word is written about a rule, the rule itself is read: the regulation, the directive, the RFC, the standards document. Not the press release announcing it, and not a law firm’s client note about it.
- Find the article number. A deadline that cannot be pinned to a numbered provision is treated as a rumour until it can.
- Check what is in force today. Instruments have application dates distinct from their adoption dates, and the gap is where most published errors live. Our compliance calendar lists only dates written into the text of the act.
- Write the trade-off, not the verdict. If a choice has an operational cost — a reconnect that the application has to handle, a key whose lifetime has to be decided — that cost is the story.
Comparisons
Where two or three options have to be set against each other, they are set out as a table: one axis per column, every column sourced, no total and no score. Readers can weight the columns themselves; we do not know their constraints and will not pretend to by publishing a number out of five.
Photography and illustration
Images are either published with the original material or taken from freely licensed sources, with a caption that says what is in the frame. We do not use generated imagery to illustrate a factual claim, and we do not use a stock photograph of a stranger to stand in for a named person.
Corrections
The procedure, in full:
- Write to the desk at [email protected], naming the page and the sentence.
- We check the claim against the source the page cites. If the page cites no source, the claim comes out immediately — an unsourced figure is a defect regardless of whether it is true.
- The page is corrected in place and a dated line is added at its foot, saying what it said before.
- If the error was material and recent, the correction is also noted on The Wire.
We do not have a correction backlog to show off, and we are not going to invent one. What we can promise is the procedure above and the date of the last review of the standing pages, which is printed in the footer of every page.
Archive
This domain was used before the Dispatch by a Pittsburgh marketing company, and its material is still here, at its original addresses, because other sites link to those addresses and breaking them would serve nobody. Those pages are marked with an archive plate, indexed in the 2017–2018 archive, and kept out of the ticker and off the front page. Identifying details of the former occupant — company name, telephone number, postal address, staff names and photographs — have been removed. The prose itself has not been edited.